JesusOnline.com

MENUMENU
  • Discover
    Evidence
    • About God
      • Has Science Discovered God?
      • Was Life Created by Design?
      • Accident or Intelligent Design?
      • Does God Exist?
    • About Jesus
      • The Jesus of History: Man or Myth?
      • Was Jesus a Real Person?
      • Is Jesus God?
      • Was Jesus the Messiah?
      • Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
      • More Questions…
    • About the Bible
      • Is the Bible True?
      • Are the Gospels Reliable?
      • The Gospel of Barnabas: Secret Bible?
      • Are the Gnostic Gospels Factual?
      • Is the Bible Infallible?
      • The Bible’s Buried Secrets
    • Related Videos
      • “God Evidence” Videos
      • “Jesus Evidence” Videos
      • “Bible Evidence” Videos
  • Meet
    Jesus
    • Why Jesus?
    • The Gift of Heaven
    • Jesus’ Resurrection and You
    • Are You Going to Heaven?
    • Related Videos
  • Follow
    Jesus
    • Next Steps
      • Discover New Resources
      • Explore God’s Word
      • Connect with Believers
      • Why Grow?
    • Living for Jesus
      • Born Again as a New Creation
      • Trusting by Faith
      • Abiding in Christ
      • Embracing Your New Identity
      • Loving God Wholeheartedly
      • Pursuing Truth in God’s Word
      • Depending on the Spirit’s Power
      • Obeying God Faithfully
      • Connecting with God’s Family
      • Resisting the Enemy
      • Advancing Christ’s Kingdom
    • Time in God’s Word
      • Read eBible
      • Download Bible
      • Devotionals
      • Key Verses
      • Bible Study Tools
    • Related Videos
      • “Next Steps” Videos
      • “Living for Jesus” Videos
      • “Time in God’s Word” Videos
  • Find Hope
    & Love
    • #GODisHOPE
    • FOREVER LOVED!
  • Translate
    & More
    • Share Jesus
    • Join Community
    • Download App
    • Contact Us
    • Search
  • Download
    JO App
     Discover Evidence
  •   Overview
  •   Has Science Discovered God?
  •   Accident or Intelligent Design?
  •   Does God Exist?
  •   "God Evidence" Videos
  •   Overview
  •   Man or Myth?
  •   Was Jesus a Real Person?
  •   Is Jesus God?
  •   Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
  •   "Jesus Evidence" Videos
  •   More Questions...
  •   Overview
  •   Is the Bible True?
  •   Are the Gospels Reliable?
  •   The Secret Gospel?
  •   Are Gnostic Gospels Factual?
  •   Is the Bible Infallible?
  •   The Bible's Buried Secrets
  •   "Biblical Evidence" Videos
  •   "Next Steps" Videos
  •   "Living for Jesus" Videos
  •   "Time in God's Word" Videos

We like you.
Like us back on social media!


Accident or Intelligent Design?

Paleontology: The Case of the Missing Links

Charles Darwin was a genius who correctly explained why viruses mutate, house insects have evolved resistance to our pesticides, and dogs, cats, and humans, come in various shapes sizes and colors. These observable changes in nature within a particular species are called microevolution.

But Darwin made a big leap from the observable to the theoretical by proposing macroevolution. He theorized that all of life developed gradually over time as one species evolved into a new species. However, Darwin’s leap of macroevolution has never been empirically verified. Thus when scientists take issue with Darwin’s theory of evolution, they are not debating changes evident within a species. They are simply pointing out the fact that no evidence exists that all of life evolved by undirected natural selection.

Darwin proposed a way to test his theory of macroevolution. During the lengthy process, millions of transitional species would leave a trail of fossil evidence. Darwin predicted that the discovery of these transitional fossil forms would eventually prove his theory right. Such fossils would take us from the world of theory and “what ifs” to the world of forensics. Fossils are hard evidence, not theoretical probabilities.

There were plenty of fossils for Darwin to evaluate in his day, but he was concerned that his theory’s predicted transitional fossils were absent from the fossil record. He asked,

“But as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?” Charles Darwin

It’s still a good question.

But why are the missing links essential to Darwin’s theory? Couldn’t gradual macroevolution have occurred without producing transitional fossils? Not according to Darwin.

And certainly if countless species had undergone very gradual transitions from one category to another (for example, cats into dogs or fish into birds), then, according to Darwin, there should be countless fossils. The trail of evidence should be abundantly evident in the fossil record.

Now, a century and a half later, there is an abundance of evidence, with over a billion fossils that have been scrutinized. And it seems to be going against Darwin’s theory. The transitional fossils Darwin predicted would validate macroevolution are embarrassingly absent. Even ardent evolutionist, Niles Eldredge admits,

“No one has found any such in-between creatures…and there is a growing conviction among many scientists that these transitional forms never existed.”Niles Eldredge

Another setback for materialists is the Cambrian explosion, a period where complex life forms developed much quicker than gradual evolution predicts. Stephen Jay Gould, a staunch advocate of materialistic evolution, sums up the problem for Darwinists:

 “We do not know why the Cambrian explosion could establish all major anatomical designs so quickly. … The Cambrian explosion was the most remarkable and puzzling event in the history of life.” Stephen Jay Gould

Darwin said that his theory would “absolutely break down” if sudden appearances of species were ever discovered. These sudden appearances of new life forms during the Cambrian explosion prompted Gould and Eldredge to theorize that Darwin was wrong about gradualism. Renouncing Darwinian gradualism, they derived a theory entitled “punctuated equilibria,” which says that life evolved too quickly to leave a trail of transitional fossils.

Although materialists point to a few spurious fossils they say are transitions, most paleontologists are surprised at the lack of hard evidence to support Darwin. However, those who believe in intelligent design are not at all surprised. The results fit perfectly with a master architect who superintended his creation.


The Unique Origin of Man

Paleoanthropologists (scientists who study the origin of man) have been searching for hundreds of years to discover human ancestors. Darwin’s theory predicts the evolution of man from ape-like creatures would result in a fossil trail. But that trail has become a source of frustration due to the lack of a direct ancestor.

Additionally, paleoanthropologists are baffled by the single origin and sudden appearance of Homo sapiens in the fossil trail. Many evolutionists had predicted that the evolution of man would be common and widespread throughout different geographical regions. However, mitochondrial DNA studies have shown that our species originated from one location, and one mother (they call Eve).

Although fossil hunters have discovered a few extinct species of hominids, these creatures are vastly inferior to humans in their intellectual capacities. In fact, there is a huge jump from such hominids to our own species. Evolutionist Ian Tattersall (curator at the American Museum of Natural History) remarks in his book The Fossil Trail:

“Something extraordinary, if totally fortuitous, happened with the birth of our species….Homo sapiens is as distinctive an entity as exists on the face of the Earth, and should be dignified as such instead of being adulterated with every reasonably large-brained hominid fossil that happened to come along.” Anthropologist Ian Tattersall

Thus the evolution of man remains an enigma with Darwinists. Homo Sapiens came from one location, one ancestor, and have much larger brain cavities than hominids. Additionally, we are the only species with the capacity for spoken language. This led reputed evolutionist Ernst Mayr to state,

“Man is indeed as unique, as different from all other animals, as had been traditionally claimed by theologians and philosophers.” Evolutionist Ernst Mayr

Thus, if we truly are unique, we need to revisit the question of whether we are the accidental winners of a grand cosmic lottery, or whether we are special creations in a grand cosmic scheme.

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Filed Under: Articles, Intelligent Design

Previous | Next

Featured Videos

Is There a God?

Is There a God?

We can’t prove or disprove the existence of God. How can we even know if there is a God? [watch video]
World's Most Famous Atheist Accepts Existence of God by Anthony Flew

World's Most Famous Atheist Accepts Existence of God by Anthony Flew

In 1955, Professor Antony Flew set the agenda for modern atheism with his Theology and Falsification, a paper presented in a debate with C.S. Lewis. [watch video]
The Case For The Creator by Lee Strobel

The Case For The Creator by Lee Strobel

Lee Strobel examines various scientific evidences that reveal the existence of God. [watch video]
Are the Odds in God's Favor?

Are the Odds in God's Favor?

Does science point to the existence of a creator? John Burke examines the scientific evidence that suggests we are the product of intelligent design. [watch video]
God or Atheism -- Which Is More Rational?

God or Atheism -- Which Is More Rational?

Belief in God, as Professor Kreeft shows, is more rational than belief in nothing. Logic, science, and reason, support God. [watch video]

God Evidence videos

Copyright © 2022   |   JesusOnline Ministries   |   Contact Us   |   Sitemap   |   Privacy Policy   |   Website Terms of Use Policy

  EXPLORE THE APP NOW